Skip to main content

Review 24: The Flick by Annie Baker

The Flick
My first play of my 100 Book Year is the Pulitzer prize-winning The Flick from American playwright Annie Baker. Oof, that almost sounds like the opening to Wikipedia article. But instead of rewriting it, I’m just going to reference that fact and turn this intro into solid gold through the lazy medium of apparent self-awareness.

ANYWAY, it centres on three people working in a run-down little cinema in Worcester, Massachusetts. It’s the first I’ve read / seen of Annie Baker, but it’s apparently very representative of her style: lots of small, apparently mundane conversations by everyday people, that are vehicles for big overall emotional shifts.

This gives a lot of space for nuance, which I like, and goofball humour, which I like even more. Imagine all the crummiest jobs a minimum-wage cinema attendant might have to deal with, condensed into a few short interactions. It could be depressing, but Baker makes it hilarious.

Plays are different to novels in that novels have the luxury of being able to spell out their themes and thoughts across a longer expanse, whereas plays have to cover a lot of ground in comparatively few words. So this has actually stuck with me more than some novels, as I continue to mull over what Baker is expressing in Flick. I’m also as cultured as non-bio yoghurt, so I could have got this all wrong. But my interpretation is that this is, at its heart, a play about honesty and authenticity.

You have Avery, a young university student who believes that analogue film is the only true medium of film. He’s obsessed with it, and acts as a neat counterbalance to his colleagues who, frankly, couldn’t give a lukewarm hotdog whether the film is projected analogue, digital or into space. He is plagued by his own worry that he isn’t authentic even in his love of this, and certainly not in the world.

Then you have Rose, a green-haired projectionist. I’ll confess to a silent internal groan about the hair colour, which has become something of a lazy way to signal that oh my god, this girl don’t play by no mainstream rules! She’s off the quirk-o-meter! in popular culture. But actually this plays right into Baker’s exploration of honesty. Rose projects (pun blissfully intended) a strong image to cover a weak sense of self.

And finally there’s Sam, a mid-thirties ex-metalhead who thinks he’s in love with Rose. But he doesn’t even know her, and it seems like maybe he’s just acting out an idea of being in love with her.

The theme that ties all of this together is, ultimately, the inauthenticity of film itself. People don’t really act like they do in films (apart from actors, who literally act like they do in films), but we’re drawn to treat it as a guide on how to act anyway. We covet the beauty of film-stars, use film to explore the way we should morally behave, even though it’s too simplistic and compact to ever really represent the full ethical spectrum we have to negotiate, and too prone to black-and-white responses.

This is all just my interpretation though. In a way, that’s the best thing about the play. All of this is unspoken, and left to the audience to piece together, so if you want to put time into it, you’ll get a lot out of it. As well as scatological jokes-a-plenty. And who could resist that? Not this guy.

--

This is my twenty-fourth book review of 100 to raise money for Refuge, the domestic abuse charity. If you liked this review, or just want to help out, please donate on the link below!

JustGiving - Sponsor me now!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review 19: Eleanor Oliphant Is Completely Fine by Gail Honeyman

I imagine a lot of unimaginative reviews of this book say something like, Eleanor Oliphant is not Completely Fine, contrary to the title! and then they laugh at their own tiny joke for four hours. You won’t find that here, even though it is both true and apposite. Instead you’ll see me saying: this is a really great book. Even forgetting the inspired name of the protagonist, which never stops sounding like the name of an elegant elephant, it’s really good. Eleanor Oliphant lives alone and has forged an existence for herself of work, trips to the local Tesco Metro, and gentle, vodka-infused oblivion on the weekends. She doesn’t deal well with people. In fact, Oliphant displays an almost total lack of empathy. At first, you suspect that she may be autistic, since she shows all the signs: difficulty relating to others, low tolerance for leaving her routines, having to learn the outward signs of emotions by rote and experience, rather than innately understanding the differe
2 comments
Read more

Review 7: Homegoing by Yaa Gyasi

The first thing you see when you open Yaa Gyasi’s Homegoing is six pages of quotes from reviews saying how good it is. If you’re like me (and with any luck you’re not), you’ll think: talk about putting yourself under pressure . Happily, Gyasi more than rises to the implicit challenge set by her voluminous praise. The scope of her book - following two branches of an African family tree as they become separated by time and distance – is beautifully realised, with each chapter representing another generational step down. Homegoing is, in its clearest sense, about the reverberating impact of slavery on black people, both in the lands they were ripped from and the lands they were taken to. But the core theme that ties the book together is connection between those two strands of people. The title could be considered a reference to ‘returning’ to Africa, but I think it’s more powerful when considered as more abstract – the re-binding of the strands of people who have been separa
Post a Comment
Read more

Review 1: Stasiland: Stories from Behind the Berlin Wall, by Anna Funder

My rating: 5 of 5 stars I am hungover and steer myself like a car through the crowds at Alexanderplatz station. How could you not love a book that begins like that? Early on in Stasiland , Anna Funder discusses the ‘puzzle women of Nuremberg’. This is a group of underfunded people (both men and women, oddly) who spend their days piecing together the scraps of documents the Stasi hurriedly shredded at the end of their regime. It feels like an apt analogy for Funder’s book itself – she carefully and brilliantly pieces together a view of what it was like to live in East Germany, and the effect it’s had on its citizens decades after the Berlin Wall was wrenched down, from snapshot interviews, research and her own experiences… despite the fact that most people she encounters would rather sweep it under the rug and pretend it never happened. I came to this book knowing that East Germany was run as a Communist surveillance state, but little else. That was no problem.
1 comment
Read more