Skip to main content

Review 25: With the End in Mind: Dying, Death, and Wisdom in an Age of Denial by Dr. Kathryn Mannix

With the End in Mind: Dying, Death, and Wisdom in an Age of Denial
There’s not much more predictable than death. Not the exact nature of anyone’s death, but the fact that we’re all going to hit the doom saloon at one point or another. And yet we fear it; avoid preparing for it; create unhelpful taboos around it. On a scale of dopey things to do, this ranks right up there with Morris dancing.

This is one of the key messages of Dr. Kathryn Mannix’s With the End in Mind. Through a number of examples from her time working in palliative care, she explores what death really looks like and how to come to terms with it in an age increasingly concerned with preserving life at all costs.

There are some genuinely moving points in the book, but for me none was more so than the first time she watches a consultant describe the dying process to a woman with a terminal condition, who is scared of the pain and loss of dignity she believes it to include. Mannix carefully recounts the process for us to benefit from too: gradually increasing tiredness, regular cycles of fast-then-slow breathing, gentle periods of unconsciousness, ending with one from which you don’t wake. Pain, nausea, worry – all of these are completely managed and manageable, even in the most severe conditions.

All this gave me a deep sense of relief from a worry I didn’t even know I’d been carrying. I think we all, in some way or another, are scared of getting a terminal disease. Live fast, die young, and so forth. But actually, if it’s going to be painless and gentle at the end, then that can change our perspective. Live at an appropriate speed, die when you feel like it, maybe.

On that: Mannix is clearly of the belief that death shouldn’t be prolonged for the sake of a life of poor quality, with which it’s difficult to disagree. She also – although she tries not to – makes it clear that she is not a supporter of euthanasia, which I had some difficulty with, but I do respect her position, and the overall message she gives is that the comfort of the patient should be paramount.

It is a little longer than it needs to be, and it has a leaning towards sentimentalism that can come across as patronising at times, which does undermine the message of removing over-emotional sentiment from the idea of death. I would also recommend reading with your eyes, not your ears: Elizabeth Carling, who narrates the audiobook, really hams up the sentimentality and becomes more irritating over time with overemphasis and dodgy, bordering-on-racist accents.

So it’s not a perfect book. But at a time when we’ve never avoided confronting death more, it’s important and fascinating to meet it head-on.

Finally, the other key message in the book is: don’t let your reticence to talk about death prevent you from talking about it with your loved ones, and making preparations. After all, it’s inevitable, and the more prepared you are now, the easier you can make a painful time.

Plus you get to write your own epitaph, if you want, and who’s gonna stop you from including the full lyrics of Ghostbusters? After all, it’s your funeral.

--

This is my twenty-fifth book review of 100 to raise money for Refuge, the domestic abuse charity. If you liked this review, or just want to help out, please donate on the link below!

JustGiving - Sponsor me now!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review 40: Gut: The Inside Story of Our Body’s Most Underrated Organ by Giulia Enders

Earlier in the year, I read Mary Roach’s Gulp - a fascinating and hilarious journey down the alimentary canal. When picking up Giulia Enders’ Gut , I worried that I might be over-gutted. What more could I possibly have to learn, having already read one other book? Fortunately, Ender’s bestseller couldn’t be a better companion piece to Roach’s. Where Gulp is a light-hearted set of the facts that she found most interesting, Gut goes and fills in more of the hard detail. Both are immensely readable, but the former is set to entertain, and the latter to inform. They complement perfectly. Enders (and let’s not forgo the cheap mention of nominative determinism here) makes you fall in love with the gut by being in love with it herself. Her passion and joy blast out of every sentence, and like so many things discussed within the book, that’s infectious. Sometimes the writing style feels slightly young, but I think that’s to make it engaging to a wide audience, and is easily over...

Review 43: The Lottery and Other Stories by Shirley Jackson

I didn’t quite know what to expect from Shirley Jackson. I feel like she’s often put into the thriller category, but if you encountered her alongside John Grishams and P.D. Jameses, I suspect you’d consider her misplaced. Mostly, though, I only knew it from a brief mention on The Simpsons, shortly before Homer throws the book into the fireplace. I know, I know. This is what you get from Broken Britain’s education system. Imagine my delight, then, to find that The Lottery and other stories is a collection of carefully-crafted short story gems. Turns out that people enter the literary canon for a reason. Who knew? Jackson’s stories have a clear theme running through them of propriety and conformity. She tackles these from lots of different angles – judgemental mothers, anxious homeowners, murderous communities. These are all brilliantly polished, mostly viewed from the perspective she knew best – city life in 40s and 50s America. There’s a clear focus on gender here too, w...

Review 24: The Flick by Annie Baker

My first play of my 100 Book Year is the Pulitzer prize-winning The Flick from American playwright Annie Baker. Oof, that almost sounds like the opening to Wikipedia article. But instead of rewriting it, I’m just going to reference that fact and turn this intro into solid gold through the lazy medium of apparent self-awareness. ANYWAY, it centres on three people working in a run-down little cinema in Worcester, Massachusetts. It’s the first I’ve read / seen of Annie Baker, but it’s apparently very representative of her style: lots of small, apparently mundane conversations by everyday people, that are vehicles for big overall emotional shifts. This gives a lot of space for nuance, which I like, and goofball humour, which I like even more. Imagine all the crummiest jobs a minimum-wage cinema attendant might have to deal with, condensed into a few short interactions. It could be depressing, but Baker makes it hilarious. Plays are different to novels in that novels have the...