Skip to main content

Review 25: With the End in Mind: Dying, Death, and Wisdom in an Age of Denial by Dr. Kathryn Mannix

With the End in Mind: Dying, Death, and Wisdom in an Age of Denial
There’s not much more predictable than death. Not the exact nature of anyone’s death, but the fact that we’re all going to hit the doom saloon at one point or another. And yet we fear it; avoid preparing for it; create unhelpful taboos around it. On a scale of dopey things to do, this ranks right up there with Morris dancing.

This is one of the key messages of Dr. Kathryn Mannix’s With the End in Mind. Through a number of examples from her time working in palliative care, she explores what death really looks like and how to come to terms with it in an age increasingly concerned with preserving life at all costs.

There are some genuinely moving points in the book, but for me none was more so than the first time she watches a consultant describe the dying process to a woman with a terminal condition, who is scared of the pain and loss of dignity she believes it to include. Mannix carefully recounts the process for us to benefit from too: gradually increasing tiredness, regular cycles of fast-then-slow breathing, gentle periods of unconsciousness, ending with one from which you don’t wake. Pain, nausea, worry – all of these are completely managed and manageable, even in the most severe conditions.

All this gave me a deep sense of relief from a worry I didn’t even know I’d been carrying. I think we all, in some way or another, are scared of getting a terminal disease. Live fast, die young, and so forth. But actually, if it’s going to be painless and gentle at the end, then that can change our perspective. Live at an appropriate speed, die when you feel like it, maybe.

On that: Mannix is clearly of the belief that death shouldn’t be prolonged for the sake of a life of poor quality, with which it’s difficult to disagree. She also – although she tries not to – makes it clear that she is not a supporter of euthanasia, which I had some difficulty with, but I do respect her position, and the overall message she gives is that the comfort of the patient should be paramount.

It is a little longer than it needs to be, and it has a leaning towards sentimentalism that can come across as patronising at times, which does undermine the message of removing over-emotional sentiment from the idea of death. I would also recommend reading with your eyes, not your ears: Elizabeth Carling, who narrates the audiobook, really hams up the sentimentality and becomes more irritating over time with overemphasis and dodgy, bordering-on-racist accents.

So it’s not a perfect book. But at a time when we’ve never avoided confronting death more, it’s important and fascinating to meet it head-on.

Finally, the other key message in the book is: don’t let your reticence to talk about death prevent you from talking about it with your loved ones, and making preparations. After all, it’s inevitable, and the more prepared you are now, the easier you can make a painful time.

Plus you get to write your own epitaph, if you want, and who’s gonna stop you from including the full lyrics of Ghostbusters? After all, it’s your funeral.

--

This is my twenty-fifth book review of 100 to raise money for Refuge, the domestic abuse charity. If you liked this review, or just want to help out, please donate on the link below!

JustGiving - Sponsor me now!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review 7: Homegoing by Yaa Gyasi

The first thing you see when you open Yaa Gyasi’s Homegoing is six pages of quotes from reviews saying how good it is. If you’re like me (and with any luck you’re not), you’ll think: talk about putting yourself under pressure . Happily, Gyasi more than rises to the implicit challenge set by her voluminous praise. The scope of her book - following two branches of an African family tree as they become separated by time and distance – is beautifully realised, with each chapter representing another generational step down. Homegoing is, in its clearest sense, about the reverberating impact of slavery on black people, both in the lands they were ripped from and the lands they were taken to. But the core theme that ties the book together is connection between those two strands of people. The title could be considered a reference to ‘returning’ to Africa, but I think it’s more powerful when considered as more abstract – the re-binding of the strands of people who have been separa...

Review 40: Gut: The Inside Story of Our Body’s Most Underrated Organ by Giulia Enders

Earlier in the year, I read Mary Roach’s Gulp - a fascinating and hilarious journey down the alimentary canal. When picking up Giulia Enders’ Gut , I worried that I might be over-gutted. What more could I possibly have to learn, having already read one other book? Fortunately, Ender’s bestseller couldn’t be a better companion piece to Roach’s. Where Gulp is a light-hearted set of the facts that she found most interesting, Gut goes and fills in more of the hard detail. Both are immensely readable, but the former is set to entertain, and the latter to inform. They complement perfectly. Enders (and let’s not forgo the cheap mention of nominative determinism here) makes you fall in love with the gut by being in love with it herself. Her passion and joy blast out of every sentence, and like so many things discussed within the book, that’s infectious. Sometimes the writing style feels slightly young, but I think that’s to make it engaging to a wide audience, and is easily over...

Review 28: Bitch Planet, Vol. 1: Extraordinary Machine by Kelly-Sue DeConnick

I’ve never been a fan of the word bitch when applied to women, so I confess to some reticence about picking up Bitch Planet . After all, if I don’t like it being used about one woman, using it to describe a whole planet should rocket me into heights of discomfort previously only known to people visiting emergency rooms having glued bits of themselves to other bits of themselves. I needn’t have worried. Its use in Kelly-Sue DeConnick’s graphic novel series is exactly to underline the reason I don’t like it in the first place. The eponymous Bitch Planet is a sexist epithet used by men to describe an off-world prison reserved for women who don’t fit into the neat box that society wants them in. Its use is deliberate and knowing, rather than lazy. Yeah, okay Nash, keep yer sociolinguistic jibber-jabber to yerself. What’s the actual story, you pretentious codpiece? Thank you, dear reader, I value your feedback. Essentially the premise is somewhere between The Handmaid’s Tale and Th...